FROM: dagger@cdc.org
He's a suspect in an investigation.
I am the official channel.
Call them short, just to rub it in.
More proving the point, actually.
He said I wouldn't reveal his height, I said I would, he called me a loser. Who's the loser now?
You just don't do that, you know? It's very rude.
Of course. Nobody listens to me as it is, I have to make examples.
Continue that line of discussion and you're dead before the day is out.
I'm on to you, Peanut Sauce.
Soggy Vegetable.
I was cursing you in a different language, it's translating badly.
Human languages are so limiting.
LMAO...
Date: 2014-10-29 03:05 pm (UTC)FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
I don't understand, Sir. Why are you sending me a recruit's height?
Re: LMAO...
Date: 2014-10-29 03:08 pm (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
He's a suspect in an investigation.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:11 pm (UTC)I see.
FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
I'm afraid I'm no detective though. Shouldn't you be taking this through proper channels?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:14 pm (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
I am the official channel.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:18 pm (UTC)... Well, then what am I supposed to do with this information? Have they done anything wrong?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:19 pm (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
Call them short, just to rub it in.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:25 pm (UTC)...
FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
So you're pranking someone, Sir?
[Admittedly he's never actually spoken to Dagger before; he's avoided him after all the general death threats. But he definitely did not expect this.]
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:29 pm (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
More proving the point, actually.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-29 03:31 pm (UTC)I feel like there is context here that I've missed. How does calling someone short prove a point?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 03:53 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
He said I wouldn't reveal his height, I said I would, he called me a loser. Who's the loser now?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 05:48 am (UTC)Ah, it all makes sense now.
[Not really, but he's refraining from actually speaking his mind.]
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 05:55 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
You just don't do that, you know? It's very rude.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 05:59 am (UTC)Yes, I would definitely agree. After all, you're only trying to look out for our best interests, correct?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:04 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
Of course. Nobody listens to me as it is, I have to make examples.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:11 am (UTC)Not even your fellow instructors?
FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
Actually now that I'm thinking about it, you remind me of a character from a book I once read.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:16 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
Continue that line of discussion and you're dead before the day is out.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:18 am (UTC)FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
Ah... which one? Or is it both, Sir?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:27 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
I'm on to you, Peanut Sauce.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:29 am (UTC)Peanut Sauce?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:31 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
Soggy Vegetable.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:33 am (UTC)With... all due respect. A peanut is not the same as a vegetable.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:34 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
I was cursing you in a different language, it's translating badly.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:38 am (UTC)Oh.
FROM: wurstel.ferdinand@cdc.org
Understood.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:43 am (UTC)FROM: dagger@cdc.org
Human languages are so limiting.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-30 06:50 am (UTC)In a way they are very crude. Most insults involve some form of genitalia or bodily function.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: